The Guilt of an Officer Whose Men Died in His Care
Stanzas 3-5 of "In Memoriam, Private D. Sutherland, killed in action in the German trench 16 May 1916, and the others who died," by E.A. Mackintosh
You were only David's father,
But I had fifty sons
When we went up in the evening
Under the arch of the guns,
And we came back at twilight-
O God! I heard them call
To me for help and pity
That could not help at all.
Oh, never will I forget you,
My men that trusted me,
More my sons than your fathers',
For they could only see
The little helpless babies
And the young men in their pride.
They could not see you dying,
And hold you when you died.
Happy and young and gallant,
They saw their first-born go,
But not the strong limbs broken
And the beautiful men brought low,
The piteous writhing bodies,
They screamed 'Don't leave me, sir"
For they were only your fathers
But I was your officer.
What
struck me most about this poem is the immense guilt evident throughout. The
history behind the poem brought into focus the reasons E.A. Mackintosh carried
guilt over the death of Private David Sutherland. In 1916, Mackintosh was
leading a trench raid near Arras. Two of Mackintosh’s men were killed during
the raid – Private David Sutherland was one of them. Sutherland lost several
limbs during the raid. Mackintosh was attempting to bring Sutherland back to the
trenches when Sutherland died of his wounds and had to be left behind. As Mackintosh
stated in the poem, “the Bosches” – a term for German soldiers – “have got [Sutherland’s]
body,” and there is no known burial place for Sutherland.
![]() |
| David Sutherland is commemorated in the Arras memorial. |
In the poem, Mackintosh is addressing Sutherland’s father.
In the third stanza Mackintosh writes “You were only David’s father.” The word “only”
catches the eye because it seems that Mackintosh is downplaying the importance of
Sutherland’s father. The following line says “But I had fifty sons.” This line
clearly shows that Mackintosh felt extremely responsible as the officer of these
men and is comparing himself to their fathers. Mackintosh’s guilt over their
deaths is painfully evident throughout the poem as he says “I heard them call /
To me for help and pity / That could not help at all.” Mackintosh believes that
he has failed his “sons” because he could not save them. Mackintosh was nicknamed
“Tosh” by his troops and was essentially a father to them.
In the fourth stanza there is a clear shift in who
Mackintosh is addressing. The stanza starts with the lines “Oh, never will I
forget you, / My men that trusted me.” While in the beginning of the poem, Mackintosh
was addressing David Sutherland’s father, he is now directly addressing his own
men.
Though Mackintosh seems to believe he failed his men, he
still says that his men were “more [his] sons than [their] fathers’.” This is a
bold assertion for Mackintosh to make, but he attempts to prove his point when he
addresses his dead soldiers and says “[your parents] could not see you dying, /
And hold you while you died.” When I read these lines, their effect was
jarring. The lines show the close proximity that this officer had to his
soldiers as they died, but it also shows the duty he feels to be with his
soldiers in their last moments when their own fathers cannot.
Mackintosh describes his mens’ deaths in detail in the
poem. He uses phrases such as “strong limbs broken,” and “piteous writhing
bodies.” These images Mackintosh evokes show that he is haunted by the sight of
his dying men. The reason he still feels haunted by their deaths can be found
in the last line when he says “they were only your fathers / But I was your
officer.” It is a father’s job to protect his children, but Mackintosh is saying
that his job as an officer goes beyond that. An officer is meant to lead his
men, protect them, and stay beside them in their last moments. Mackintosh was
unable to save David Sutherland, and this poem is a depiction of the responsibility
and guilt an officer feels over his lost men.
For more information on
E.A. Mackintosh: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewart_Alan_Mackintosh
http://www.scottishpoetrylibrary.org.uk/poet/e-alan-mackintosh/


I loved this poem, actually, it was in the running to be my blog post as well. I'm glad someone did it. I didn't even think to look into who Sutherland was, but the tragedy of his death does make the piece much more poignant. I think the fact that he was a real person is really heartbreaking in a way that talking about a random soldier isn't. That idea leads back to the Stalin quote that comes up in class all the time.
ReplyDeleteI was likewise shocked by the "only" in the poem. I wonder if that upset parents or if they understood and even agreed with Mackintosh?
The other thing that stood out to me, and I don't think was intentional on the author's part, is the name David. David is a biblical character, and a well known one at that. He famously fought the giant Goliath and one. I wrote in my book "anyone with a dead son could read this and imagine their child going off to kill giants." Obviously, Mackintosh chose David because that was the dead man's name, but it is an interesting coincidence that makes the poem more universal.
After doing the research on who David Sutherland was, I could only imagine the specific details of what happened to him. I did the research on Sutherland immediately after reading the poem because I was interested by the individuality expressed in the poem. Like you pointed out, Mackintosh is not mourning a thousand deaths, he's just mourning one man whose father now weeps over his death. I completely agree that somehow this individuality makes the poem even more heartbreaking.
DeleteBecause of the "In Memorium," in the title of the poem, it never occurred to me to think about the meaning of the name David. I was so interested when you said this, because though like you said Mackintosh most likely didn't make this biblical connection because David Sutherland is a real person, looking at the poem through this biblical perspective is so interesting. Everyone (especially in wartime) would want to believe that their child would miraculously have the strength to beat a giant like David in the Bible.